Transparency over reach
Every score is a number you can argue with. We publish the rubric, the test conditions, the wash cycles, and the photos — so you can re-grade us when you disagree.
Maillot de Foot CN is an independent editorial desk dedicated to Chinese-made and Chinese-market football kits. No affiliate fluff, no AI slop — just hands-on wear tests, fabric forensics, and ranked verdicts you can trust.
It started with a stack of three replicas and a disagreement. Which one actually breathes on a humid 32°C matchday? Which stitching holds after twenty machine washes? Which badge is glued, and which is embroidered tight enough to survive a slide tackle?
Most review sites either chase Western drops (Nike, Adidas, Puma) or treat the Chinese market as a footnote. We went the other way. We built Maillotdefootcn.com as a permanent testing ground for kits made in, sold in, or worn across China — and we publish every score, every test photo, and every flaw we find.
Today the desk is four reviewers, one textile engineer, and a borrowed lightbox. We buy what we test, we name what we like, and we never run sponsored placements disguised as editorial.
If a jersey can't survive these three tests, it doesn't get a review. If a brand can't survive them, it doesn't get a ranking.
Every score is a number you can argue with. We publish the rubric, the test conditions, the wash cycles, and the photos — so you can re-grade us when you disagree.
If a $12 replica out-performs a $90 replica, we say so in the headline. If a buzzy "limited" drop falls apart at the seams, we photograph the seam. The badge on your chest shouldn't be a lie.
We wear-test every jersey for a minimum of three full training sessions and one match-grade 90 minutes. The lab comes after the pitch, not before it.
The desk has been logging kits since 2021. Here's the receipt.
Six steps, same for every kit — whether it's a 39 rmb street replica or a 1,290 rmb national-team drop.
Kits are bought at full price from official stores, authorized resellers, or Taobao/Tmall storefronts flagged as authentic. Receipts are kept; we never accept free samples.
Every jersey is photographed under 10x magnification: stitching density, badge attachment, seam tape, dye uniformity, weave pattern. We log fabric weight and composition claims vs. measured GSM.
Each kit is worn across three training sessions (interval, tempo, gym) plus one 90-minute 11-a-side match. Sweat maps, hot-spot friction, and collar behavior are recorded.
Ten cold machine cycles, then a tumble dry. We measure pilling, color drift, badge peel, and seam slippage. Logos that crack by cycle five lose points — loudly.
Tested across three body types (S / M / L) with measurement grids. We flag vanity sizing, off-center hems, and any kit that runs a full size off-label.
Scores feed our 9-axis rubric and the live leaderboard. Reviewers sign the verdict; dissenting opinions are published in the comments.
Writers, a textile engineer, and a stubborn ex-goalkeeper. We rotate lead reviewer duties so no single taste steers the leaderboard.
Ex-Super League kit manager. Has personally steam-pressed more polyester than he'd like to admit. Edits every review before it ships.
Reads weave diagrams the way most people read menus. Owns a GSM scale, a thread counter, and an opinion on every Dri-FIT variant since 2014.
Plays Sunday-league 11-a-side in Hangzhou. Wears the kits so the rest of us don't have to pretend matchday sweat doesn't exist.
Tracks the small Taobao studios and emerging ateliers. Maintains our brand index and is the first to flag a counterfeit wave.
We take reader submissions. Send the brand, the season, and the price you paid — if it fits the desk's queue, we'll buy, test, and publish a full review within four weeks.